\documentclass[12pt, epsf]{article}
\usepackage[finnish]{babel}   %% suomalainen tavutus
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} %% 8-bittiset tiedostot
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}      %% 8-bittiset fontit
\usepackage[dvips]{epsfig}
\textheight 22cm
\textwidth 16cm
\headheight -1.7 cm
%\footheight 0.1cm
\oddsidemargin 3mm
\topskip 1mm
\parskip 0.5cm
\parindent 1cm
\baselineskip 6mm
\begin{document}
%\input epsf
\noindent
{\large Tik-61,181: Bioinformatics} \hfill Kaski,Mannila,Nikkilä\\ 
{\large Exercises 2 (part 2), Autumn 2000}

In essay type answers try to answer briefly and concentrate on
relevant issues. It is assumed that the assistant will need only
reasonable amount of time when decoding the answers. If the opposite
occurs, it may affect your grade.

The maximum length of an answer to one question is one page. If you make
some proofs or simulations they can be included as appendixes.  Every
answer will be evaluated with the scale \{0:failed, 3:accepted,
5:accepted with distinction\}. In order to pass the course you need at 
least grade 3 for 60\% of the exercises. In order to pass with
distinction you need to return 95\% of the exercises, and to get the
grade 5 for most of them.

The deadline of the exercises is 31.1.2001.


\begin{itemize}

\item[a)]Compare the goals,the methods and the performance of MORGAN (SSK Ch.10) and GRAIL (SSK Ch.7)

\item[b)] Outline the main methodological advantages of the SVMs vs. other supervised methods and describe one task to which the SVM is well-suited(other than the one in Brown et al.'s paper) and one task to which the SVM is not suitable (in the field of bioinformatics). 

\item[c)] Explain how the double dynamic programming used in SSK Ch.14 differs from the dynamic programming.

\end{itemize}
\end{document}