T-61.5020 Statistical Natural Language Processing
Exercises 3 -- Information retrieval
Version 1.0
1.
There are 10000 documents in a database. A user makes a query that should give six relevant documents. Two competing search engines return ordered lists of ten documents. The relevant ones are marked with $ +$ in the table below. Consider the quality of the results using the measures mentioned below.

$\textstyle \parbox{.5\linewidth}{
\begin{itemize}\item Precision
\item Recall
\...
...tem Error
\item F-measure
\item Uninterpolated average precision
\end{itemize}}$
  relevance
Document engine 1 engine 2
d1 + +
d2 + +
d3 - +
d4 + -
d5 - +
d6 - -
d7 - +
d8 - -
d9 - +
d10 + -

2.
Word $ w_1$ exists in 21 documents and word $ w_2$ in 500 documents in a collection of 10000 documents. Word $ w_1$ occurs total 101 times in all the documents, $ w_2$ 700 times. How much these words should be weighted in a search engine? Try Inverse Document Frequency (IDS) and Residual Inverse Document Frequency (RIDF) as weighting methods.
3.
Let's use the following made-up news headlines as data:
$ d_1$:
Future of Moscow track at stake -- Formula 1 racing continues in Austria.
$ d_2$:
Self-confident Schumacher: Track of Sepang suits Ferrari.
$ d_3$:
Collision of stars -- Wreck worth over 35 euros left in the track of Hungaroring.
$ d_4$:
Five formula cars in wreck, Schumacher blames Coulthard for the collision.
$ d_5$:
On the trail of meteors to find the origin of the galaxy.
$ d_6$:
Dozens of planets fall from their tracks yearly in our galaxy.
$ d_7$:
A star turned out to be a planet.
Make a document-word matrix for words Schumacher, track, formula, collision, galaxy, star, planet, and meteor. Use stemming. How similarities of documents change if you reduce the dimension to two using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)? Consider specially the correlation between the documents $ d_5$ and $ d_7$.



svirpioj[a]cis.hut.fi